Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    UID:
    edocfu_9959243196502883
    Format: 1 online resource (vii, 216 pages) : , digital, PDF file(s).
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 1-107-14828-6 , 1-280-43727-8 , 0-511-18430-1 , 0-511-16600-1 , 0-511-16405-X , 0-511-31288-1 , 0-511-61638-4 , 0-511-16485-8
    Content: In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour for discussants who want to resolve their differences in a reasonable way. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.
    Note: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). , Cover; Half-title; Dedication; Title; Copyright; Contents; Preface; 1 Introduction; 2 The Realm of Argumentation Studies; 3 A Model of a Critical Discussion; 4 Relevance; 5 Analysis as Reconstruction; 6 Rules for a Critical Discussion; 7 Fallacies; 8 A Code of Conduct for Reasonable Discussants; References; Index , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-521-53772-X
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-521-83075-3
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages