Format:
1 Online-Ressource (43 Seiten)
Content:
Do people in different countries understand and frame the principle of meritocracy differently? This question is the starting point for this cross-national analysis of the moral repertoires of meritocracy in four countries: Germany, Norway, Slovenia and the United Kingdom. The authors pursue a mixed methods approach, using data from the European Social Survey 2016 and qualitative data from group discussions. In these discussions, citizens openly talked about issues like inequality and social policy, which allows us to study their understandings and framings of meritocracy. The authors show that the issue of unequal rewards does not only find different levels of support, but also that people – corresponding to the context they live in – have different understandings of which merits should count. The authors identify a ‘market success meritocracy’ in the UK, a work-centred understanding in Germany, a ‘common good meritocracy’ in Norway, and non-salience of this issue in Slovenia.
Content:
Peer Reviewed
In:
Leiden : Brill, 19,4–5, Seiten 542-584
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1163/15691330-BJA10017
URN:
urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/23794-4
URL:
Volltext
(kostenfrei)
