ISBN:
9781786350411
Inhalt:
Purpose The goal of this chapter is to both provide a sociological explanation for gender differences in risk-taking behavior and to explain how such gender differences in behavior may contribute to women’s underrepresentation at the top of hierarchies. Methodology/approach I synthesize relevant research findings from the fields of social psychology, economics, psychology, decisions science, and sociology. Originality/value I argue that risk-taking is a gendered action due to both prescriptive and descriptive gender stereotypes. The fact that risk-taking is a gendered action offers sociological insights as to why women take fewer risks than men. First, women may rationally choose to take fewer risks, given that risk-taking is less rewarding for them. Second, the aforementioned gender stereotypes may cause institutional gatekeepers to give women fewer opportunities to take risks. Sociologists should care about this phenomenon because large rewards are attached to successful risk-taking behavior. Thus, if men as a group take more successful risks than women as a group – simply because they take more risks, and thus by chance experience more successful risks – then more men than women will experience upward mobility caused by risk-taking. Social implications Gender differences in risk-taking behavior likely depress the upward mobility of women and are a contributing factor to the dearth of women in top positions. In this era of falling formal barriers and women’s educational gains, gender differences in risk-taking behavior are likely of increasing importance for understanding the inequalities in hierarchies in U.S. society.
In:
Advances in group processes., Bingley, U.K. : Emerald, 2016, (2016), Seite 179-210, 9781786350411
In:
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
In:
year:2016
In:
pages:179-210
Sprache:
Englisch
DOI:
10.1108/S0882-614520160000033007
URL:
Volltext
(Deutschlandweit zugänglich)
