feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    UID:
    gbv_1637482507
    Format: vii, 224 Seiten
    Edition: First edition
    ISBN: 9780198812852
    Content: Ten new essays critique the practice armed humanitarian intervention, and the 'Responsibility to Protect' doctrine that advocates its use under certain circumstances. The contributors investigate the causes and consequences, as well as the uses and abuses, of armed humanitarian intervention. One enduring concern is that such interventions are liable to be employed as a foreign policy instrument by powerful states pursuing geo-political interests. Some of the chapters interrogate how the presence of ulterior motives impact on the moral credentials of armed humanitarian intervention. Others shine a light on the potential adverse effects of such interventions, even where they are motivated primarily by humanitarian concern. The volume also tracks the evolution of the R2P norm, and draws attention to how it has evolved, for better or for worse, since UN member states unanimously accepted it over a decade ago. In some respects the norm has been distorted to yield prescriptions, and to impose constraints, fundamentally at odds with the spirit of the R2P idea. This gives us all the more reason to be cautious of unwarranted optimism about humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect.
    Note: Literaturhinweise, Register , Morality, Reality and Humanitarian Intervention : An Introduction to the Debate , Complicating the Moral Case of Responsibility to Protect : Kosovo and Libya , Why Sovereignty Matters Despite Injustice : the Ethics of Intervention , Women and Humanitarian Intervention , Humanitarian Intervention and Non-Ideal Theory , The Leeriness Objection to the Responsibility to Protect , On the Uses and "Abuses" of R2P , Scrutinizing Intentions , "Words lying on the table"? : Norm Contestation and the Diminution of the Responsibility to Protect , Responsibility to Protect, Polarity and Society : R2P's Political Realities in the International Order , Closing the R2P Chapter : Opening a Dissident Current within Philosophy of War
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe Challenges for humanitarian intervention Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2018 ISBN 9780191850646
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe Challenges for humanitarian intervention Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2018 ISBN 9780192542137
    Language: English
    Subjects: Political Science
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Responsibility to Protect ; Humanitäre Hilfe ; Militär ; Ethik ; Verantwortung ; Aufsatzsammlung
    Author information: Meyer, Marco 1986-
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    UID:
    gbv_1778588549
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource
    ISBN: 9780198754855
    Content: We humans can enhance some of our mental and physical abilities above the normal upper limits for our species with the use of particular drug therapies and medical procedures. We will be able to enhance many more of our abilities and be able to do so in more ways in the not-too-distant future. Some commentators have welcomed the prospect of human enhancement technologies becoming widely used, while others have viewed it with alarm and have made clear that they find human enhancement morally objectionable. Unfortunately the debate over the ethics of human enhancement appears to have reached an impasse, with proponents and opponents of human enhancement drawing on different intellectual traditions, relying on different methodologies and ‘talking past one another’. In order to move this debate forward, we need either to find new ways of understanding the current debate or to develop new ways of thinking about the ethics of human enhancement. In this volume leading philosophers and bioethicists invite us to adopt new ways to think about the ongoing debate, either by drawing on work in psychology that helps to explain common reactions to the prospect of human enhancement or by finding points of comparison between the current debate about the ethics of human enhancement and other academic debates, such as the debate about justice for people with disabilities. Other contributors offer original lines of argument about the ethics of human enhancement and seek to take that debate in new directions
    Note: English
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages