Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 4605-4605
    Abstract: Abstract 4605 Introduction With the FDA and EMA approval of Bendamustine and Rituximab new treatment options have recently become available to patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Clinical registries provide insight into real-life treatment of pts. They can help to answer the question whether patients may benefit from new research findings. Methods The clinical registry on lymphoid neoplasms (TLN Registry), conducted by iOMEDICO in collaboration with the Arbeitskreis Klinische Studien (AKS) and the Kompetenznetz Maligne Lymphome (KML), prospectively collects data on the treatment of pts with lymphoid B-cell neoplasms as administered in hematology outpatient centres in Germany. Pts are followed for 5 years. A broad set of data regarding patient and tumor characteristics, comorbidities, all systemic treatments, response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival are recorded. Since May 2009, 106 sites have actively recruited a total of 2579 pts. Results From the overall sample, 420 pts received systemic 1st-line treatment for CLL. 65% of pts are male, mean age at time of primary diagnosis was 66 years (yrs) and at start of therapy 69 yrs. Tumor stage was 20% Binet A, 35% Binet B and 45% Binet C. 68% of pts (n=285) were diagnosed with at least one comorbidity, mainly hypertension (37%) or diabetes (15%); the average Charlson Comorbity Index of 0.7 indicates that overall pts have few comorbities. Rituximab is part of the 1st-line treatment in 82% (n=345) of pts with CLL. Bendamustine is part of the 1st-line treatment in 59% (n=247) of pts with CLL. It is mostly applied in combination with Rituximab (BR, 51%, n=213). Further 7% (n=28) receive Bendamustin as monotherapy. Fludarabine is part of the 1st-line treatment in 31% (n=132) of pts with CLL. It is applied in combination with Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR, 25%, n=103), as monotherapy (4%, n=15) or in combination with Cyclophosphamide (FC, 1%, n=6). Chlorambucil is part of the 1st-line treatment in 7% (n=31) of pts with CLL. It is applied as monotherapy (4%, n=15) or in combination with Rituximab (2%, n=10). Pts receiving BR, FCR or Chlorambucil differ. Pts characteristics indicate that BR and Chlorambucil are applied preferably in elderly pts (mean 70.1 (BR) vs. 75.7 (Chlorambucil) vs. 63.4 (FCR) yrs). Also, BR is given preferably in advanced stages of the disease as compared to FCR (Binet C 49% vs. 34%). The use of BR has increased from 41% in 2009 to 57% in 2011, while the use of FCR has decreased from 33% in 2009 to 17% in 2011. Of all pts with CLL in the TLN, 181 have received 2nd-line treatment. Rituximab is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 76% (n=137) of pts with CLL. Bendamustine is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 66% (n=120) of pts with CLL. It is mostly applied in combination with Rituximab (BR, 56%, n=101). Further 10% (n=18) receive Bendamustin as monotherapy. Fludarabine is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 20% (n=37) of pts with CLL. It is applied in combination with Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR, 10%, n=18), as monotherapy (5%, n=9) or in combination with Cyclophosphamide (FC, 3%, n=5). Chlorambucil is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 4% (n=7) of pts with CLL. It is mostly applied in combination with Rituximab (2%, n=4). Conclusion Rituximab and Bendamustine are the most frequently used drugs for the treatment of CLL in German hematology outpatient centres. The use or BR has significantly increased since 2009. In contrast, the use of FCR has decreased and only a minority of pts receive Chlorambucil. This indicates that in Germany Chlorambucil is no longer considered the “standard of care” for elderly pts with CLL. These data also show that results from clinical trials are quickly implemented into daily practice. The impact of these new treatment options on quality of life and survival remains to be of central interest in the future. Disclosures: Knauf: Mundipharma GmbH: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 3666-3666
    Abstract: Abstract 3666 Introduction With the FDA and EMA approval of Bendamustine a new treatment option has recently become available to patients (pts) with indolent (low-grade) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). Clinical registries provide insight into real-life treatment of pts. They can help to answer the question whether patients may benefit from new research findings. Methods The clinical registry on lymphoid neoplasms (TLN Registry), conducted by iOMEDICO in collaboration with the Arbeitskreis Klinische Studien (AKS) and the Kompetenznetz Maligne Lymphome (KML), prospectively collects data on the treatment of pts with lymphoid B-cell neoplasms as administered in hematology outpatient centres in Germany. Pts are followed for 5 years. A broad set of data regarding patient and tumor characteristics, comorbidities, all systemic treatments, response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival are recorded. Since May 2009, 106 sites have actively recruited a total of 2579 pts. Results From the overall sample, 645 pts received systemic 1st-line treatment for indolent Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). 53% of pts are male, mean age at time of primary diagnosis was 65 years (yrs) and at start of therapy 66 yrs. Tumor stage was 7% Stage I, 15% Stage II, 25% Stage III and 54% Stage IV. 61% of pts (n=387) were diagnosed with at least one comorbidity, mainly hypertension (33%) or diabetes (12%); the average Charlson Comorbity Index of 0.6 indicates that pts have few comorbities. Rituximab is part of the 1st-line treatment in 94% (n=606) of pts with iNHL. Bendamustine is part of the 1st-line treatment in 71% (n=455) of pts with iNHL. It is mostly applied in combination with Rituximab (BR, 66%, n=428). Further 2% (n=10) receive Bendamustin as monotherapy. Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine/Prednisone (R-CHOP) as 1st-line treatment is applied in 16% (n=105) of pts with iNHL. Pts receiving BR or R-CHOP differ. Pts characteristics indicate that BR is applied preferably in elderly pts (mean 67.3 vs. 60.9 yrs). However, BR is the preferred treatment also in pts younger than 66 yrs (60% vs. 23%). The use of BR has increased from 62% in 2009 to 68% in 2011, whereas the rate of R-CHOP has decreased from 19% in 2009 to 15% in 2011. Of all pts with iNHL, 121 have received 2nd-line treatment. Rituximab is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 84% (n=102) of pts with iNHL. Bendamustine is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 68% (n=82) of pts with iNHL. It is mostly applied in combination with Rituximab (BR, 60%, n=72). Further 7% (n=9) receive Bendamustin as monotherapy. R-CHOP as 2nd-line treatment is applied in 7% (n=9) of pts with iNHL. Conclusion BR is the most frequently used systemic treatment for pts with iNHL in German hematology outpatient centres. The use of BR has continuously increased since 2009. In contrast, the use of R-CHOP has decreased. This indicates that in Germany R-CHOP can no longer be considered as “standard of care” for pts with iNHL. These data also show that results from clinical trials are quickly implemented into daily practice. The impact of BR on quality of life and survival remains to be of central interest in the future. Disclosures: Knauf: Mundipharma GmbH: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 2449-2449
    Abstract: Abstract 2449 Introduction: Bendamustine (BEN), either alone or in combination with Rituximab, is increasingly used in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and various types of low grade Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). The approval to treat CLL with BEN is based on a prospectively randomized trial (Knauf et al., J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4378–4384) comparing single drug BEN with chlorambucil (CLB). Here, we report on follow-up data of this pivotal trial with specific reference to survival times, time to next treatment, and efficacy of second line regimens. Since CLL is a disease of the elderly and potentially co-morbid patients, we also analyzed quality of life (QoL) parameters in relation to the treatment with both BEN and CLB. Patients and Methods: The efficacy and safety of BEN and CLB have been compared in a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III trial in patients with previously untreated advanced (Binet stage B/C) CLL. Patients were randomized to receive either BEN (100 mg/m2 on days 1 + 2) or CLB (0.8 mg/kg on days 1 and 15) for up to 6 treatment cycles. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), which was defined as complete (CR) or partial response (PR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), and QoL. The latter was analyzed by using both the EORTC questionnaires QLQ C30 and QLQ-CLL25. We also looked at time to next treatment and efficacy of second line regimens. The response to treatment was evaluated by a blinded Independent Response Assessment Committee. Results: A total of 319 patients were randomized (162 BEN and 157 CLB), all of whom were included in the efficacy analysis, while 308 patients were evaluable for QoL analysis (158 BEN and 150 CLB). Median age was 64 years (range 35 to 78). The mean number of treatment cycles was 5 in both study arms, regardless of an age above or below 65 years. The median observation time was 54 months. ORR was significantly higher with BEN than with CLB (68% versus 31%, P 〈 0.0001). A CR was achieved in 31% of pts with BEN and in 2% of pts with CLB (P 〈 0.0001). In the intent to treat (ITT) population, the median PFS was 21.2 months with BEN and 8.8 months with CLB (P 〈 0.0001). Sixty-three patients in the BEN treated group and 35 in the CLB treated group had not received any second line therapy (P 〈 0.001) at the time of this analysis. The median time to next treatment in the ITT population was 31.5 months with BEN and 10.1 months with CLB (P 〈 0.0001). ORR after second line therapy of any type was 35.4% in the BEN first line arm and 45.9% in the CLB first line arm (P=0.131). So far, there is no difference in OS (P = 0.24; hazard ratio = 1.3 in favour of BEN) in the ITT population. However, patients achieving a CR (almost exclusively after BEN) experienced a longer OS than pts not in CR (median not reached versus 76.2 months; P=0.002). Also, pts with any response (CR + PR) either after BEN or CLB had a longer OS than the non-responders (median not reached versus 68.3 months; P 〈 0.0001). Base line scores regarding QoL parameters showed no difference between the groups. After completion of study treatment (mean 5 cycles administered), no differences became evident with respect to physical, social, emotional, and cognitive functioning. The self assessment of the global health status also revealed no difference. Conclusion: This study has shown that BEN offers significantly greater response rates, PFS, and a much longer time to next treatment than CLB. OS is prolonged significantly in all responders and especially in those patients who achieve CR after BEN. In comparison to CLB, the additional efficacy of BEN was achieved without compromising QoL. BEN should be considered as a backbone drug in first-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced CLL. Disclosures: Knauf: Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Klein: Mundipharma: Honoraria. Merkle: Mundipharma: Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 4779-4779
    Abstract: Background High quality response [very good partial remission (VGPR), complete remission (CR)] is associated with improved long-term outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) therapy. Lenalidomide (Len)/ dexamethasone (Dex) (Rd) is considered a standard 2nd-line regimen. However, after 1st-line MM therapy containing a “novel agent” like thalidomide, only a relatively small fraction (21.3%) of patients (pts) achieved VGPR or better when RD was used in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM)1. Bendamustine (Ben) is an alkylating agent with superior activity compared to melphalan/prednisone. The combination of Ben, Len and Dex (BRd) in pts with advanced RRMM resulted in dose-limiting hematotoxicity, which restricted its efficacy in extensively pretreated pts2. However, recent phase I experience demonstrated the feasibility of BRd as 2nd- and 3rd-line myeloma therapy3. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the BRd-regimen as 2nd line therapy for RRMM. Patients and methods This multicenter Phase II study was designed to enroll 50 pts with RRMM undergoing 2nd-line MM therapy [including also pts with prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)]. Pts had to have measurable disease, ECOG performance status 0-2, adequate hematological values and a creatinine clearance 〉 50 ml/min. Study treatment consisted of Ben 75 mg/m2 i.v. day (d) 1 & 2 and Len 25 mg p.o. d 1-21 for a total of six 28-day induction cycles. Dex (40 and 20 mg p.o. for pts 〈 = or 〉 75 years of age, respectively) was given on d 1, 8, 15, and 22. Pegfilgrastim 6 mg s.c. was administered on d 3 in case of severe neutropenia, treatment delay due to neutropenia or febrile neutropenia according to predefined application rules. Induction treatment was followed by 12 cycles (28 d) of maintenance therapy with Rd at the same dose. The primary study endpoint was the CR/VGPR rate after induction therapy, based on standard IMWG criteria. A Simon's two stage design was used to differentiate between 20% (considered uninteresting) vs 40 % (considered promising, power of 80%, p=5%) of high quality responses. At least 13 pts with VGPR or better after induction therapy were required to meet the statistical threshold predefined for promising activity of the BRd regimen in this study. Results 50 pts were enrolled between 04/2012 and 07/2014 (median age 68 years [46-84y], 73% men). 49% pts had ISS stage II/III, 42.5% had undergone prior SCTs, and 13% had known high risk cytogenetic aberrations. 91% of pts had received novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib) during 1st-line therapy. At the time of abstract submission, data from 38 pts having completed induction treatment were available. Final analysis of the primary study endpoint including all patients will be updated and presented at the meeting. Of the currently 38 evaluable pts, 20 (52.6%, Table 1) achieved a CR/VGPR after a median of 3.3 induction cycles. Only 1 patient experienced disease progression (PD) during induction phase. 77% of pts received pegfilgrastim. Dose reduction during induction therapy was required in 7.7% of pts. 42.5% received 〈 6 scheduled induction cycles (50% due to toxicities, 50% for other reasons). 49% had treatment-related SAEs. Grade 3/ 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 51%/25.5% and 23.4%/8.5% of pts, respectively. Only 1 patient developed CTC grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were infections (14%), rash (9.5%), and diarrhea (9.5%). Anaphylactic reaction grade 4 related to Ben and pulmonary embolism grade 3 occurred in 1 patient each. A cerebral insult grade 4 occurred in a patient non-compliant with the anti-thrombotic prophylaxis required per protocol. One death due to respiratory failure (considered to be unlikely related to study treatment) was reported for an 83 year old male. Conclusion BRd is a safe and efficacious regimen for 2nd line treatment of RRMM patients whose 1st-line therapy included thalidomide or bortezomib. High quality responses ( 〉 = VGPR) can be achieved in a considerable proportion (52.6%) of these pts. Our study suggests that the fraction of patients achieving VGPR or better after BRd treatment may be substantially higher than attainable with Rd alone. References 1 Wang et al. Blood, 2008, 112: 4445-51 2 Lentzsch et al. Blood, 2012, 119: 4608-13 3 Poenisch et al., Br J Haematol, 2013, 162, 202–9 Table 1 Best response after induction CR VGPR PR MR SD total (n=38) 3 17 15 1 2 prior ASCT (n=16) 2 6 7 1 0 no prior ASCT (n=22) 1 11 8 0 2 Disclosures Mey: Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of Bendamustine in relapsed/refractory Multiple Myekoma. To investigate the efficacy and safety of Bendamustine in combination with the standard backbone of Lenalidomide/ Dexamethasone in patients with replaced/refractory MM.. Bargetzi:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Taverna:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schmid:Celgene: Honoraria. Knauf:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. von Moos:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hiendlmeyer:Celgene: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Hitz:Celgene: Research Funding. Driessen:Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 119, No. 21 ( 2012-05-24), p. 4851-4859
    Abstract: The CLL3 trial was designed to study intensive treatment including autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) as part of first-line therapy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Here, we present the long-term outcome of the trial with particular focus on the impact of genomic risk factors, and we provide a retrospective comparison with patients from the fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) arm of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) CLL8 trial. After a median observation time of 8.7 years (0.3-12.3 years), median progression-free survival (PFS), time to retreatment, and overall survival (OS) of 169 evaluable patients, including 38 patients who did not proceed to autoSCT, was 5.7, 7.3, and 11.3 years, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly reduced in the presence of 17p- and of an unfavorable immunoglobulin heavy variable chain mutational status, but not of 11q-. Five-year nonrelapse mortality was 6.5%. When 110 CLL3 patients were compared with 126 matched patients from the FCR arm of the CLL8 trial, 4-year time to retreatment (75% vs 77%) and OS (86% vs 90%) was similar despite a significant benefit for autoSCT in terms of PFS. In summary, early treatment intensification including autoSCT can provide very effective disease control in poor-risk CLL, although its clinical benefit in the FCR era remains uncertain. The trial has been registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00275015.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages